Succeeding With Hybrid App Development

Succeeding With Hybrid App Development

Gartner predicted that more than 50 percent of mobile apps would be hybrids by 2016. This prediction has come to fruition as more and more enterprises realize the benefits associated with hybrid applications. Mobile devices are now being used frequently in the workplace, leading many organizations to form a mobile strategy that allows them to handle any device of either major mobile platform (iOS & Android) brought into the workplace by their employees. This initiative has forced companies to address the need for mobile applications by leveraging them across multiple platforms.

Cost-Effective Mobile Applications

Hybrid apps are proving to be a sound investment for companies because code written in programming languages that such as JavaScript and C# can be shared across multiple mobile platforms. These capabilities mean that the development and future maintenance of hybrid apps is more cost effective because of the centralized approach. This is especially important in today's market as technologies are developing at a rapid rate, making some technologies obsolete sooner.

Retailers Walmart, GNC and Belk have chosen hybrid apps over others because they have enabled them to operate across both iOS and Android – while still being able to use native features like barcode scanning for in-store functionality.

Potential Pitfalls

Developing hybrid applications is less time consuming and costs less than creating native apps, which may give the impression that hybrid apps are not as good as native apps. However, this is not the case. It really depends on the purpose of the application. There are a few things to consider.

Determine which features require native and non-native features. For instance, some high-end graphical experiences are easing done using native technologies, whereas accessing a customer's location for instance doesn't. Having a clear idea of what is needed to achieve a functional app is a great starting point.

When developing an app, there are limitations. Some of these include memory and user experience. Consider how much memory the app will use. Mobile devices are smaller, so memory is limited. Also, animations should be carefully thought out because hybrid apps can sometimes lag during state transitions, particularly on some lower-end Android devices.

The hybrid framework is also an important factor, and there are many to choose from. The most established hybrid frameworks are probably a safer bet because they are more likely to be around in the future. Do research to find out which hybrid frameworks other successful companies are adopting, as this will help establish the hybrid frameworks that are likely to go the distance. We recommend Ionic and Xamarin for most hybrid projects, depending on the level of the platform differentiation your app is going to need; Ionic provides are more unified experience where Xamarin is designed for most platform specific experiences.

Advantages of Hybrid

Hybrid apps are known for their flexibility as they are a combination of native apps and web apps. For many developers, It's not about having to choose which one; it's more about choosing the best features of both applications. This versatile approach means that developers can almost build an app that is entirely constructed from HTML, JavaScript and CSS. Hybrid apps can also leverage native components for functionality that is difficult or impossible to develop in the hybrid framework.

Native Apps vs. Xamarin vs. Ionic

Native vs  Xamarin vs Ionic

Enterprises Adopt Hybrid Apps

According to Gartner, workers in a digital environment use an average of three different devices during the working day. Gartner predicts that this will increase to five or six as technologies like wearable devices become mainstream. These days, many employees are given the freedom to choose a device that will enable them to complete a task. It's estimated that as the prevalence of mobile devices increases in the workplace, there will be a greater need for more mobile applications. Hybrid apps can be developed faster than native apps, which makes them a more practical solution.

Enterprises are realizing the benefits of choosing hybrid apps over native apps because they can operate across multiple platforms. In addition, there are also a range of features available that pure web applications wouldn't be able to offer. With hybrid apps, organizations can reuse the code and content that run on the browser for Android and iOS apps. A huge advantage here is that only the native element of the application needs to be rewritten for each new app's operating system. This method is likely to save time and money.

Summary

Hybrid apps have become increasingly popular because they make it easier to develop applications that can be used across multiple devices. These apps can also be developed sooner because parts of the original code can be reused. This is good for enterprises because they can deploy their cost-effective app sooner, and it's easier for adjustments to made when necessary. Hybrid apps are also useful for developers because it takes them less time to build an app and will help them to keep up with the growing demand for applications.

Source List:

http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3076817

https://s3.amazonaws.com/moovweb-marketing/moovweb-kinvey-native-vs-web-vs-hybrid.pdf

http://thevwa.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/native-apps-vs-hybrid-apps-vs-html-5.html

https://www.apptentive.com/blog/2015/08/25/5-points-to-consider-before-making-a-hybrid-mobile-app/

https://devdactic.com/myth-hybrid-development/